16 comparable cases

What happened in real cases

We don't promise the same for you. We show what happened when a comparable solution operated well in a case from your vertical or size.

Showing 16 of 16 cases

Atenea · ReceptionMid-market

Regional hotel group · 12 properties · ~USD 2M monthly revenue · EN/ES

Situation

Bookings falling into voicemail after 7pm and on Sundays. Spanish pre-arrival queries got answered by whoever was near the phone. Two reception shifts per property plus an outsourced answering service routing 3-5% of calls to the wrong destination.

Outcome

By day 90: every inbound answered in 60 seconds, 24/7, EN/ES. Booking conversion +22% vs the prior quarter. Outsourced answering service cancelled. Two reception shifts redirected to on-property guest experience.

+22% booking conversion90 days
Atenea · ReceptionPyME

Home services business · ~USD 3M revenue · 11 trucks · single province

Situation

The owner handled after-hours emergencies personally, typically 4-7 per night. About 30% were lost (asleep, on another job, talking to a customer). Each missed call: ~USD 850 in emergency service going to the competitor.

Outcome

By day 90: ~120 emergency inbounds captured per month that used to go to voicemail. Same-day jobs +20%. The owner sleeping at night from week 5 onward.

+20% same-day jobs, ~120 emergencies captured/month90 days
OutboundMid-market

US service operator · 30+ cities · EN/ES mix · USD 8-14M revenue

Situation

The last dedicated outbound rep left mid-quarter. The pipeline went from 40+ qualified meetings/month to 8 in six weeks. The CRM had 12,000 cold contacts; no one had touched them in over a year.

Outcome

By day 90: 893 qualified leads delivered across 36 cities, EN/ES. Reply rate 12.4% vs prior baseline of 1.8% with cold templates. Cost per qualified meeting: USD 42, vs the in-house rep's loaded cost of USD 187 the prior year.

893 qualified leads in 90 days, cost per meeting USD 42 vs USD 18790 days
OutboundMid-market

Mid-market wholesale brand · B2B export · multi-category catalog · ~USD 5M GMV in US channel

Situation

They were targeting retail buyer accounts in 12 specific US states. The outbound stack (Apollo + Outreach + Sales Nav) had been idle for six months because they couldn't find anyone to operate it.

Outcome

By day 90: 31 qualified meetings booked (target was 25). Weekly pipeline visibility. The tools the brand was already paying for finally delivering outcomes — same retainer, no extra licenses.

31 qualified meetings in 90 days, 24% above target90 days
ReviewsMid-market

Multi-location professional services · medical/dental/legal · 8 locations · ~USD 12M revenue

Situation

Average brand rating 4.2 across Google, Yelp and sector-specific platforms. One-star reviews routinely went unanswered for 4-7 days because no one owned the task. Booking conversion at low-performing locations was 12-18% below the corporate average.

Outcome

By day 90: average rating 4.6. Review velocity +210% across the portfolio. The two lowest locations pulled to within 0.1 stars of the corporate average. Negatives now answered in 47 minutes on average.

Rating 4.2 → 4.6 in 90 days, review velocity +210%90 days
ReviewsMid-market

Multi-location retail/hospitality brand · 24 branches · 5 metro markets

Situation

Per-location review velocity ranged from 4 reviews/month at strong locations to 0-1/month at weak ones. Two low-performing branches dragged the corporate rating from 4.5 to 4.2.

Outcome

By day 90: the two weak locations crossed above the corporate average. Brand rating back to 4.5. Corporate marketing stopped fielding branch-specific reputation complaints.

Brand rating recovered from 4.2 to 4.5 in 90 days90 days
Cadencia · PipelinePyME

High-volume services business · ~280 leads/month · single province · USD 4-6M revenue

Situation

CRM full but only the easy deals were closing. Reps followed up on day 1 then abandoned the rest — 60% of pipeline value never got a second touch. The owner had been calling it 'a sales problem' for two years.

Outcome

By day 120: lead-to-close conversion +21% (baseline 14%, now 17%). Cold-lead reactivation captured ~USD 340K of pipeline that would have died. The owner stopped calling it a sales problem and started watching the right metric.

Lead-to-close conversion +21% in 120 days120 days
Cadencia · PipelineMid-market

B2B with 30-90 day sales cycles · mid-market deals USD 25K-150K

Situation

Each rep carried 40-60 active opportunities. 'I'll call you back' deaths happened silently — nobody noticed until the quarterly close-rate report. The average deal sat 2.3 weeks past its stage commitment before anyone touched it.

Outcome

By day 90: ~10% of dead pipeline reactivated. No deal sitting more than 4 days past its stage commitment. Reps stopped triaging 'which deals are alive' — the system tells them.

~10% of dead pipeline reactivated in 90 days90 days
Marketing ROIMid-market

DTC ecommerce · USD 1M-10M annual GMV · primarily Meta + Google

Situation

Meta CAC had been climbing quarter over quarter for 18 months — from USD 34 to USD 58. Landings were converting below 1%. The agency kept reporting that 'spend efficiency was within target' while CAC kept rising.

Outcome

By day 90: Meta CAC USD 39 (-33% from baseline). POAS turned positive on 6 of 9 SKUs that had been negative. Landing conversion 1.7% (baseline 0.7%).

Meta CAC -33% in 90 days, landing conversion 0.7% → 1.7%90 days
Marketing ROIPyME

Local services business · USD 5-15K/month in Google Ads · single region

Situation

Quality score below 5 on half the keywords. Cost-per-lead climbing from USD 42 to USD 61 over 14 months. The owner convinced that 'Google was getting more expensive'.

Outcome

By day 90: cost-per-lead USD 46 (-25%). Quality score climbed from 5.3 to 7.8 across the account. Content inbound contributing 22% of new leads by month 6.

Cost-per-lead -25% in 90 days90 days
RetentionMid-market

Multi-property hospitality · regional brand · 14 properties · ~26,000 unique guest records

Situation

No cross-property tracking. The same loyal guest got treated as 'new' on every visit to a different property. Lifecycle marketing was a generic monthly newsletter going to all 26K with a 7% open rate.

Outcome

By day 90: returning guest rate +18% (baseline 23%, now 27%). Cross-property bookings +34%. Newsletter retired; targeted lifecycle generates 4× the revenue per send.

Returning guests +18%, cross-property bookings +34% in 90 days90 days
RetentionMid-market

DTC ecommerce · mature catalog · ~45,000 customers · 14% repeat rate

Situation

Customers bought once and vanished. ~32,000 customers had never been touched after their first transaction.

Outcome

By day 90: ~2,400 dormant customers reactivated (7.5% of dormant base). Repeat rate climbed to 19% within the active base. LTV/CAC ratio improved from 2.1 to 3.4.

Repeat rate 14% → 19%, LTV/CAC 2.1 → 3.4 in 90 days90 days
Manual processesPyME

Services business · ~22 people · single region · USD 5M revenue

Situation

The office manager and ops coordinator were drowning in invoicing, scheduling and weekly reports. The owner had two more admin hires forecast to cross USD 7M. The office manager was a flight risk — they'd already lost two in the past year.

Outcome

By day 60: ~70 hours/month of manual work eliminated. The office manager redirected to a client-success role; she stayed. The 'two more admin hires' forecast was killed.

~70 hours/month eliminated in 60 days60 days
Manual processesMid-market

Multi-store ecommerce ops team · 4 stores · two platforms · ~USD 15M GMV

Situation

Order exceptions, returns, and supplier coordination handled by hand. The ops lead's projection: 'We can't scale to 6 stores without adding 4 more ops people'.

Outcome

By day 90: 2× volume capacity without adding ops headcount. The '4 more people' projection went to 0 — the next hires went to merchandising instead.

2× capacity without adding headcount in 90 days90 days
Pulso · VisibilityMid-market

Multi-store ecommerce · USD 5-25M annual GMV · two platforms

Situation

CM2 (level-2 contribution margin), POAS, inventory and churn all in separate Google Sheets. Numbers always 2-3 weeks out of date. Monthly P&L review surfaced problems that had been growing for 4-6 weeks.

Outcome

By day 60: dashboard in active weekly use. The first two anomaly alerts: a returns spike on a SKU (caught 19 days before it would have hit the monthly P&L) and a conversion drop at the biggest store (caught in hours). Monthly P&L stopped bringing surprises.

Dashboard live + anomalies auto-detected in 60 days60 days
Pulso · VisibilityMid-market

Multi-property hospitality · 19 properties · ~USD 2.1M monthly revenue

Situation

P&L, pricing, booking profitability and reconciliation scattered between PMS exports and Excel. Reconciliation alone consumed 4-5 days every month-end across the central ops team.

Outcome

By day 60: reconciliation 4-5 days → 6 hours. A single executive view replaces three weekly ops calls. ~10,000 monthly transactions auto-reconciled.

Reconciliation 4-5 days → 6 hours in 60 days60 days

Does any case look like yours?

Request your Insight Report or book a 30-minute call.